MathWorks (2016) Statistics Toolbox Users Guide. When the outlier in the x direction is removed, r decreases because an outlier that normally falls near the regression line would increase the size of the correlation coefficient. It would be a negative residual and so, this point is definitely to become more negative. The standard deviation used is the standard deviation of the residuals or errors. Posted 5 years ago. Unexpected uint64 behaviour 0xFFFF'FFFF'FFFF'FFFF - 1 = 0? And so, I will rule that out. Outlier's effect on correlation. \(Y2\) and \(Y3\) have the same slope as the line of best fit. How does an outlier affect the coefficient of determination? Learn more about Stack Overflow the company, and our products. Ice cream shops start to open in the spring; perhaps people buy more ice cream on days when its hot outside. The Pearson correlation coefficient (often just called the correlation coefficient) is denoted by the Greek letter rho () when calculated for a population and by the lower-case letter r when calculated for a sample. We call that point a potential outlier. So let's be very careful. 24-2514476 PotsdamTel. The correlation coefficient indicates that there is a relatively strong positive relationship between X and Y. References: Cohen, J. pointer which is very far away from hyperplane remove them considering those point as an outlier. First, the correlation coefficient will only give a proper measure of association when the underlying relationship is linear. Students would have been taught about the correlation coefficient and seen several examples that match the correlation coefficient with the scatterplot. c. We'll if you square this, this would be positive 0.16 while this would be positive 0.25. I hope this clarification helps the down-voters to understand the suggested procedure . The CPI affects nearly all Americans because of the many ways it is used. By clicking Accept all cookies, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy. r squared would decrease. something like this, in which case, it looks . Spearman C (1910) Correlation calculated from faulty data. bringing down the slope of the regression line. The simple correlation coefficient is .75 with sigmay = 18.41 and sigmax=.38, Now we compute a regression between y and x and obtain the following, Where 36.538 = .75*[18.41/.38] = r*[sigmay/sigmax]. (MDRES), Trauth, M.H. Therefore we will continue on and delete the outlier, so that we can explore how it affects the results, as a learning experience. The denominator of our correlation coefficient equation looks like this: $$ \sqrt{\mathrm{\Sigma}{(x_i\ -\ \overline{x})}^2\ \ast\ \mathrm{\Sigma}(y_i\ -\overline{y})^2} $$. Second, the correlation coefficient can be affected by outliers. In contrast to the Spearman rank correlation, the Kendall correlation is not affected by how far from each other ranks are but only by whether the ranks between observations are equal or not. Correlation does not describe curve relationships between variables, no matter how strong the relationship is. Including the outlier will increase the correlation coefficient. Recall that B the ols regression coefficient is equal to r*[sigmay/sigmax). The only way to get a positive value for each of the products is if both values are negative or both values are positive. There are a number of factors that can affect your correlation coefficient and throw off your results such as: Outliers . We are looking for all data points for which the residual is greater than \(2s = 2(16.4) = 32.8\) or less than \(-32.8\). Rule that one out. The new line with r=0.9121 is a stronger correlation than the original (r=0.6631) because r=0.9121 is closer to one. Like always, pause this video and see if you could figure it out. Our worksheets cover all topics from GCSE, IGCSE and A Level courses. Actually, we formulate two hypotheses: the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. Using the new line of best fit, \(\hat{y} = -355.19 + 7.39(73) = 184.28\). The value of r ranges from negative one to positive one. The best way to calculate correlation is to use technology. In the table below, the first two columns are the third-exam and final-exam data. To log in and use all the features of Khan Academy, please enable JavaScript in your browser. This test wont detect (and therefore will be skewed by) outliers in the data and cant properly detect curvilinear relationships. Is there a linear relationship between the variables? Including the outlier will decrease the correlation coefficient. Impact of removing outliers on slope, y-intercept and r of least-squares regression lines. -6 is smaller that -1, but that absolute value of -6(6) is greater than the absolute value of -1(1). For two variables, the formula compares the distance of each datapoint from the variable mean and uses this to tell us how closely the relationship between the variables can be fit to an imaginary line drawn through the data. outlier 95 comma one. Is there a version of the correlation coefficient that is less-sensitive to outliers? The product moment correlation coefficient is a measure of linear association between two variables. Perhaps there is an outlier point in your data that . A small example will suffice to illustrate the proposed/transparent method of obtaining of a version of r that is less sensitive to outliers which is the direct question of the OP. Another is that the proposal to iterate the procedure is invalid--for many outlier detection procedures, it will reduce the dataset to just a pair of points. When we multiply the result of the two expressions together, we get: This brings the bottom of the equation to: Here's our full correlation coefficient equation once again: $$ r=\frac{\sum\left[\left(x_i-\overline{x}\right)\left(y_i-\overline{y}\right)\right]}{\sqrt{\mathrm{\Sigma}\left(x_i-\overline{x}\right)^2\ \ast\ \mathrm{\Sigma}(y_i\ -\overline{y})^2}} $$. You cannot make every statistical problem look like a time series analysis! Line \(Y2 = -173.5 + 4.83x - 2(16.4)\) and line \(Y3 = -173.5 + 4.83x + 2(16.4)\). Let's do another example. (2021) MATLAB Recipes for Earth Sciences Fifth Edition. Now that were oriented to our data, we can start with two important subcalculations from the formula above: the sample mean, and the difference between each datapoint and this mean (in these steps, you can also see the initial building blocks of standard deviation). The idea is to replace the sample variance of $Y$ by the predicted variance $$\sigma_Y^2=a^2\sigma_x^2+\sigma_e^2$$. $$ r=\sqrt{\frac{a^2\sigma^2_x}{a^2\sigma_x^2+\sigma_e^2}}$$ This regression coefficient for the $x$ is then "truer" than the original regression coefficient as it is uncontaminated by the identified outlier. How to Identify the Effects of Removing Outliers on Regression Lines Step 1: Identify if the slope of the regression line, prior to removing the outlier, is positive or negative. line could move up on the left-hand side The sample means are represented with the symbols x and y, sometimes called x bar and y bar. The means for Ice Cream Sales (x) and Temperature (y) are easily calculated as follows: $$ \overline{x} =\ [3\ +\ 6\ +\ 9] 3 = 6 $$, $$ \overline{y} =\ [70\ +\ 75\ +\ 80] 3 = 75 $$. Since r^2 is simply a measure of how much of the data the line of best fit accounts for, would it be true that removing the presence of any outlier increases the value of r^2. And slope would increase. Spearmans correlation coefficient is more robust to outliers than is Pearsons correlation coefficient. With the TI-83, 83+, 84+ graphing calculators, it is easy to identify the outliers graphically and visually. Finally, the fourth example (bottom right) shows another example when one outlier is enough to produce a high correlation coefficient, even though the relationship . There might be some values far away from other values, but this is ok. Now you can have a lot of data (large sample size), then outliers wont have much effect anyway. Outliers need to be examined closely. MATLAB and Python Recipes for Earth Sciences, Martin H. Trauth, University of Potsdam, Germany. Accessibility StatementFor more information contact us atinfo@libretexts.org. Note that when the graph does not give a clear enough picture, you can use the numerical comparisons to identify outliers. Is correlation affected by extreme values? ), and sum those results: $$ [(-3)(-5)] + [(0)(0)] + [(3)(5)] = 30 $$. An outlier-resistant measure of correlation, explained later, comes up with values of r*. Direct link to Tridib Roy Chowdhury's post How is r(correlation coef, Posted 2 years ago. In most practical circumstances an outlier decreases the value of a correlation coefficient and weakens the regression relationship, but its also possible that in some circumstances an outlier may increase a correlation value and improve regression. The graphical procedure is shown first, followed by the numerical calculations. and so you'll probably have a line that looks more like that. Or we can do this numerically by calculating each residual and comparing it to twice the standard deviation. Direct link to YamaanNandolia's post What if there a negative , Posted 6 years ago. Therefore, correlations are typically written with two key numbers: r = and p = . However, we would like some guideline as to how far away a point needs to be in order to be considered an outlier. Although the correlation coefficient is significant, the pattern in the scatterplot indicates that a curve would be a more appropriate model to use than a line. Therefore, correlations are typically written with two key numbers: r = and p = . A tie for a pair {(xi,yi), (xj,yj)} is when xi = xj or yi = yj; a tied pair is neither concordant nor discordant. The President, Congress, and the Federal Reserve Board use the CPI's trends to formulate monetary and fiscal policies. (MRG), Trauth, M.H. If it's the other way round, and it can be, I am not surprised if people ignore me. This correlation demonstrates the degree to which the variables are dependent on one another. For positive correlations, the correlation coefficient is greater than zero. The correlation coefficient is not affected by outliers. What I did was to supress the incorporation of any time series filter as I had domain knowledge/"knew" that it was captured in a cross-sectional i.e.non-longitudinal manner. The Karl Pearsons product-moment correlation coefficient (or simply, the Pearsons correlation coefficient) is a measure of the strength of a linear association between two variables and is denoted by r or rxy(x and y being the two variables involved). Exercise 12.7.4 Do there appear to be any outliers? No, in fact, it would get closer to one because we would have a better . If we decrease it, it's going Write the equation in the form. The correlation coefficient r is a unit-free value between -1 and 1. Sometimes, for some reason or another, they should not be included in the analysis of the data. But when the outlier is removed, the correlation coefficient is near zero. What if there a negative correlation and an outlier in the bottom right of the graph but above the LSRL has to be removed from the graph. The absolute value of the slope gets bigger, but it is increasing in a negative direction so it is getting smaller. Graphically, it measures how clustered the scatter diagram is around a straight line. How is r(correlation coefficient) related to r2 (co-efficient of detremination. Both correlation coefficients are included in the function corr ofthe Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox of The MathWorks (2016): which yields r_pearson = 0.9403, r_spearman = 0.1343 and r_kendall = 0.0753 and observe that the alternative measures of correlation result in reasonable values, in contrast to the absurd value for Pearsons correlation coefficient that mistakenly suggests a strong interdependency between the variables. For this example, the new line ought to fit the remaining data better. On the other hand, perhaps people simply buy ice cream at a steady rate because they like it so much. The result, \(SSE\) is the Sum of Squared Errors. It is defined as the summation of all the observation in the data which is divided by the number of observations in the data. So 82 is more than two standard deviations from 58, which makes \((6, 58)\) a potential outlier. than zero and less than one. { "12.7E:_Outliers_(Exercises)" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()" }, { "12.01:_Prelude_to_Linear_Regression_and_Correlation" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "12.02:_Linear_Equations" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "12.03:_Scatter_Plots" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "12.04:_The_Regression_Equation" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "12.05:_Testing_the_Significance_of_the_Correlation_Coefficient" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "12.06:_Prediction" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "12.07:_Outliers" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "12.08:_Regression_-_Distance_from_School_(Worksheet)" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "12.09:_Regression_-_Textbook_Cost_(Worksheet)" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "12.10:_Regression_-_Fuel_Efficiency_(Worksheet)" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "12.E:_Linear_Regression_and_Correlation_(Exercises)" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()" }, { "00:_Front_Matter" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "01:_Sampling_and_Data" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "02:_Descriptive_Statistics" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "03:_Probability_Topics" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "04:_Discrete_Random_Variables" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "05:_Continuous_Random_Variables" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "06:_The_Normal_Distribution" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "07:_The_Central_Limit_Theorem" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "08:_Confidence_Intervals" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "09:_Hypothesis_Testing_with_One_Sample" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "10:_Hypothesis_Testing_with_Two_Samples" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "11:_The_Chi-Square_Distribution" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "12:_Linear_Regression_and_Correlation" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "13:_F_Distribution_and_One-Way_ANOVA" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "zz:_Back_Matter" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()" }, [ "article:topic", "Outliers", "authorname:openstax", "showtoc:no", "license:ccby", "program:openstax", "licenseversion:40", "source@https://openstax.org/details/books/introductory-statistics" ], https://stats.libretexts.org/@app/auth/3/login?returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fstats.libretexts.org%2FBookshelves%2FIntroductory_Statistics%2FBook%253A_Introductory_Statistics_(OpenStax)%2F12%253A_Linear_Regression_and_Correlation%2F12.07%253A_Outliers, \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}}}\) \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{#1}}} \)\(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)\(\newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\), Compute a new best-fit line and correlation coefficient using the ten remaining points, Example \(\PageIndex{3}\): The Consumer Price Index. Lets imagine that were interested in whether we can expect there to be more ice cream sales in our city on hotter days. Positive r values indicate a positive correlation, where the values of both . If the data is correct, we would leave it in the data set. For the first example, how would the slope increase? An alternative view of this is just to take the adjusted $y$ value and replace the original $y$ value with this "smoothed value" and then run a simple correlation. Consider removing the to this point right over here. In some data sets, there are values (observed data points) called outliers. is sort of like a mean as well and maybe there might be a variation on that which is less sensitive to variation. TimesMojo is a social question-and-answer website where you can get all the answers to your questions. There does appear to be a linear relationship between the variables. that I drew after removing the outlier, this has Interpret the significance of the correlation coefficient. Is there a simple way of detecting outliers? In this way you understand that the regression coefficient and its sibling are premised on no outliers/unusual values. distance right over here. No, it's going to decrease. negative one, it would be closer to being a perfect s is the standard deviation of all the \(y - \hat{y} = \varepsilon\) values where \(n = \text{the total number of data points}\). The p-value is the probability of observing a non-zero correlation coefficient in our sample data when in fact the null hypothesis is true. mean of both variables. Ice Cream Sales and Temperature are therefore the two variables which well use to calculate the correlation coefficient. N.B. That is to say left side of the line going downwards means positive and vice versa. And so, clearly the new line The expected \(y\) value on the line for the point (6, 58) is approximately 82. What we had was 9 pairs of readings (1-4;6-10) that were highly correlated but the standard r was obfuscated/distorted by the outlier at obervation 5. Let's pull in the numbers for the numerator and denominator that we calculated above: A perfect correlation between ice cream sales and hot summer days! Although the correlation coefficient is significant, the pattern in the scatterplot indicates that a curve would be a more appropriate model to use than a line. Let's say before you By providing information about price changes in the Nation's economy to government, business, and labor, the CPI helps them to make economic decisions. Direct link to Trevor Clack's post r and r^2 always have mag, Posted 4 years ago. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top, Not the answer you're looking for? If you square something Thanks to whuber for pushing me for clarification. This means that the new line is a better fit to the ten remaining data values. Note that this operation sometimes results in a negative number or zero! least-squares regression line will always go through the On whose turn does the fright from a terror dive end? In fact, its important to remember that relying exclusively on the correlation coefficient can be misleadingparticularly in situations involving curvilinear relationships or extreme outliers. How do you find a correlation coefficient in statistics? Direct link to Caleb Man's post You are right that the an, Posted 4 years ago. And calculating a new Find points which are far away from the line or hyperplane. You will find that the only data point that is not between lines \(Y2\) and \(Y3\) is the point \(x = 65\), \(y = 175\). The most commonly used techniques for investigating the relationship between two quantitative variables are correlation and linear regression. Plot the data. Or do outliers decrease the correlation by definition? point, we're more likely to have a line that looks 0.97 C. 0.97 D. 0.50 b. rev2023.4.21.43403. the correlation coefficient is really zero there is no linear relationship). $$ r = \frac{\sum_k \frac{(x_k - \bar{x}) (y_k - \bar{y_k})}{s_x s_y}}{n-1} $$. If I appear to be implying that transformation solves all problems, then be assured that I do not mean that. Why is the Median Less Sensitive to Extreme Values Compared to the Mean? It contains 15 height measurements of human males. The correlation coefficient is affected by Outliers in our data. We could guess at outliers by looking at a graph of the scatter plot and best fit-line. Statistical significance is indicated with a p-value. Note also in the plot above that there are two individuals . Repreforming the regression analysis, the new line of best fit and the correlation coefficient are: \[\hat{y} = -355.19 + 7.39x\nonumber \] and \[r = 0.9121\nonumber \] Outliers and r : Ice-cream Sales Vs Temperature The new line of best fit and the correlation coefficient are: Using this new line of best fit (based on the remaining ten data points in the third exam/final exam example), what would a student who receives a 73 on the third exam expect to receive on the final exam? y-intercept will go higher. Besides outliers, a sample may contain one or a few points that are called influential points. Visual inspection of the scatter plot in Fig. Statistical significance is indicated with a p-value. The diagram illustrates the effect of outliers on the correlation coefficient, the SD-line, and the regression line determined by data points in a scatter diagram. No, in fact, it would get closer to one because we would have a better fit here. Use correlation for a quick and simple summary of the direction and strength of the relationship between two or more numeric variables. As much as the correlation coefficient is closer to +1 or -1, it indicates positive (+1) or negative (-1) correlation between the arrays. This prediction then suggests a refined estimate of the outlier to be as follows ; 209-173.31 = 35.69 . 'Color', [1 1 1]); axes (. A power primer. Although the maximum correlation coefficient c = 0.3 is small, we can see from the mosaic . But for Correlation Ratio () I couldn't find definite assumptions. Consequently, excluding outliers can cause your results to become statistically significant. Correlation describes linear relationships. Notice that the Sum of Products is positive for our data. The main purpose of this study is to understand how Portuguese restaurants' solvency was affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, considering the factors that influence it. . For this example, the new line ought to fit the remaining data better. The y-intercept of the On a computer, enlarging the graph may help; on a small calculator screen, zooming in may make the graph clearer. looks like a better fit for the leftover points. An outlier will weaken the correlation making the data more scattered so r gets closer to 0. The sample correlation coefficient can be represented with a formula: $$ r=\frac{\sum\left[\left(x_i-\overline{x}\right)\left(y_i-\overline{y}\right)\right]}{\sqrt{\mathrm{\Sigma}\left(x_i-\overline{x}\right)^2\ Since correlation is a quantity which indicates the association between two variables, it is computed using a coefficient called as Correlation Coefficient. In this example, a statistician should prefer to use other methods to fit a curve to this data, rather than model the data with the line we found. The new correlation coefficient is 0.98. For instance, in the above example the correlation coefficient is 0.62 on the left when the outlier is included in the analysis. Any points that are outside these two lines are outliers. So, r would increase and also the slope of We'd have a better fit to this 2023 JMP Statistical Discovery LLC. Correlation quantifies the strength of the linear relationship between a pair of variables, whereas regression expresses the relationship in the form of an equation. through all of the dots and it's clear that this But when the outlier is removed, the correlation coefficient is near zero. We know it's not going to be negative one. point right over here is indeed an outlier. equal to negative 0.5. Why R2 always increase or stay same on adding new variables. To deal with this replace the assumption of normally distributed errors in Exercise 12.7.5 A point is removed, and the line of best fit is recalculated. It's basically a Pearson correlation of the ranks. The Spearman's and Kendall's correlation coefficients seem to be slightly affected by the wild observation. All Rights Reserved. If you are interested in seeing more years of data, visit the Bureau of Labor Statistics CPI website ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/cpi/cpiai.txt; our data is taken from the column entitled "Annual Avg." In the example, notice the pattern of the points compared to the line. Data from the United States Department of Labor, the Bureau of Labor Statistics. - [Instructor] The scatterplot Data from the Physicians Handbook, 1990. An outlier will have no effect on a correlation coefficient. Which choices match that? I'm not sure what your actual question is, unless you mean your title?
How Do You Use Directional Terms In A Sentence?,
Why Is Yonderland Series 1 So Expensive,
Radio Lancashire Listen Again,
Dirty Hands 100116 Cross Reference,
Las Vegas Knife Show 2022,
Articles I
