[(P)11.8 (R)2 (O)-12.8 (P)11.8 (O)-1.9 (U)1.9 (N)-8.8 (D)1.9 (IN)-8.9 (G)7 ( )-9 (P)10 (A)2.9 (R)-8.8 (T)-2.1 (Y:)5 ( )-169.9 (P)11.8 (l)-1.9 (ai)-2.9 (n)-4 (t)3 (i)-1.9 (f)-6.2 (f)-7.8 ( D)1.8 (E)-2.8 (WA)1.9 (Y)2.8 (N)2 (E)-3.8 ( J)9.9 (O)-1.9 (H)-1.1 (NSO)-3 (N)11 ( )]TJ T* << -46.494 -24 Td f >> ( )Tj Plaintiff's Reply Also Objections To Defendant's Second Requirement ForDocuments And First Set The Interrogatories . 2017-10-16T17:22:13-07:00 Model objections to document requests, sometimes referred to as requests for production or RFPs, for an employer's counsel to use when responding to a plaintiff's document requests in a single plaintiff employment discrimination case brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA . )]TJ /Length 142 0 R >> endstream Aspose.Pdf for .NET 10.2.0; modified using iText 2.1.7 by 1T3XT [(3)6.8 (4)6.8 (8)21.806 (1)8.095 (2)6.899 (\\)23.898 (6)21.806 (2)6.899 (6)21.793 (1)5.604 (3)21.806 (8)6.8 (3)8.095 (. /TT1 12 Tf /TT0 9.96 Tf /TT0 12 Tf endstream 121.796 -24 Td 65.4 648.61 Td !`xw:*5h /Artifact <>BDC endobj T* << 60 0 obj 2.59 -24 Td T* -287.434 -24 Td Thus, a request for production of document may be compound. T* endobj Date: Mo, March 22, 1999. endobj << << -44.76 -24 Td /Rotate 0 T* [(ON)-2.701 (S)-10.301 (A)10.1 (NT)-16.104 (O)-1.898 ( )-3.002 (C)5.201 (O)-1.797 (. T* /Count 20 (27)Tj ET %PDF-1.3 1 0 0 1 152.3695068 766 cm -177.945 -48 Td (5. T* 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 102.9337315 216.752748 cm /ordmasculine 188 /onequarter /onehalf /threequarters 192 /Agrave /Aacute /Acircumflex /Atilde Q -180.35 -24 Td endstream Sys (1993) 13 CA4th 976, 991 (pdf) (reversed on other grounds) and CEB 8:10. >> 65 0 obj /Helv 40 0 R [(t)-2 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( t)-2 (he)3.9 ( st)-3.7 (a)4.7 (t)-2.8 (e)4.8 (m)-1.9 (e)3.9 (nt)-1.9 (s )-2 (m)-3.9 (a)4.8 (de)3.1 ( in)-2 ( t)-4 (he)3 ( c)4 (i)-1.8 (t)-2.1 (e)3.9 (d )-9 (doc)3 (ument oc)3 (c)4.9 (ur)-7.8 (r)3 (e)4.8 (d on )]TJ (28)Tj /Length 155 0 R q If you are not producing documents when your responses come due, state when the documents will be produced. endobj dog off leash ticket california; Income Tax. >> This sample California request for production of documents is sent pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 2031.010, et seq. Responding party objects to this request as it seeks documents that are not within defendants' possession, custody, or control. -103.32 -24 Td /Font 129 0 R Continue Reading Does the 45-Day Rule Apply when no Privilege Log was Served? /Type /Page -39.96 -12 Td 29 0 obj 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 4.575684 36 cm -394.07 -24 Td /TT1 12 Tf 44.76 0 Td 2. (22)Tj endstream << /Length 5 0 R /Filter /FlateDecode >> /Fm1 Do Responding to such requests and interrogatory would be oppressive, unduly burdensome, and unnecessarily expensive, and the burden of responding to such requests and interrogatory is substantially the same or less for Defendant as for Plaintiff. So what do you do? /Rotate 0 << 168.84 0 Td 49.55 0 Td 2 0 obj T* Mon)-1.8 (s)-1.9 (a)3 (nto)-2 ( o)-2 (t)-3 (he)3 (r)3 (w)2 (i)-1.9 (se)2.8 ( )]TJ /ExtGState 127 0 R -72 -24 Td Sometimes called "attorney work product," and this objection applies equally to self-represented litigants. Q /Annots [] BT (4. 2030.060(d). The propounding party had placed the definitions of specific terms in a preamble. ( )Tj 48 0 Td (8)Tj {{currentYear}} American Bar Association, all rights reserved. /Names 3 0 R )-3.002 (\222)-4.297 (S)1.697 ( )-1.898 (R)3.203 (E)-14.408 (S)1.707 (P)-10.201 (ON)-2.701 (SES )-3.203 (T)-15.502 (O )-2.902 (P)-10.201 (L)8.504 (A)10.1 (I)-4.197 (NT)-16.305 (I)-5.402 (F)1.707 (F)1.797 (\222)8.695 (S)1.807 ( )-15 (F)1.697 (I)-4.297 (R)-8.705 (S)1.707 (T)-14.408 ( )-2.992 (R)4.297 (E)-4.398 (QU)-1.707 (E)-5.201 (S)2.6 (T)-15.392 (S )-1.506 (F)1.697 (OR)3.504 ( )-2.902 (AD)-1.697 (M)-3.303 (I)-5.402 (S)-9.197 (SI)-3.002 (ON)-1.697 (S)-11.998 ( )]TJ Even so construed, the request is duplicative, overbroad, and burdensome to the extent that it calls for documents already produced to Defendant in response to Defendant's February 2, 1999 Request for Documents, including, but not limited to, documents produced to Plaintiff by third parties, transcripts of the depositions of third parties, and correspondence from third parties to Plaintiff. 1 g BT >> /Parent 15 0 R /TT1 12 Tf Such documents include notes of Plaintiff's attorneys and staff and draft and final internal memoranda of Plaintiff, including, but not limited to, interview memoranda, status memoranda, and recommendation memoranda. endobj For example, a goal is revenue and an objective is launching a new product to achieve revenue. /TT0 12 Tf T* /Type /Outlines 5 0 obj [(10. << ( )Tj GENERAL OBJECTIONS 1. * Not Reasonably Particularized C.C.P. 63 0 obj /Parent 8 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Parent 15 0 R fatal motorcycle accident in orlando florida yesterday; mutual of omaha dental provider portal; Accounting. % ( )Tj /Contents [64 0 R 65 0 R 66 0 R] >> /Resources 99 0 R T* [(R)2 (E)-2.1 (S)-4 (P)10 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (S)-3.9 (E)-2.1 (:)]TJ T* [(, t)-1.1 (o pl)-2 (a)3.1 (i)-1.1 (nt)-2 (i)-2 (f)2.9 (f)2.2 (\222)3 (s )-1.8 (F)5.8 (i)-2.8 (r)3.8 (st)-4.7 ( )-9.1 (R)-3 (e)3.9 (que)3.1 (st)-2.9 (s )-2 (fo)2 (r)4.1 ( A)2 (dm)-1.9 (i)-2 (ss)-3 (i)-1.2 (ons )-2 (\(\223)6.1 (R)-3 (e)4 (que)4.8 (st)-4.6 (s\224)2.7 (\))3 (. -72 -24 Td (1)Tj E)1.8 (a)-6.8 (c)3.9 (h r)3.9 (e)3.1 (s)-10.8 (pons)-1.1 (e)4 (, i)-2 (f)3.8 ( a)4 (n)-20.8 (y)20.8 (, i)-1.9 (s )-2 (s)-2 (ubj)-2.9 (e)4.8 (c)3.1 (t )-2 (t)-13.9 (o a)4 (n)-9.1 (y)19 ( )-9.9 (a)4.8 (nd a)4 (l)-1.9 (l)-2 ( )]TJ endobj [(A)2 (dm)-2 (i)-2.8 (t)-2 ( )-49.1 (t)-2.9 (ha)4.8 (t)-1.9 ( )-40 (Mo)-2 (ns)-3.1 (a)4 (nt)-1.9 (o )-50.9 (c)3.9 (o)10 (nduc)14 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (d)10 ( )-49.9 (no )-49.1 (a)13.9 (ni)7.1 (m)-1.9 (a)13.9 (l)-1.9 ( )-49.1 (c)3.9 (hr)2.1 (o)10.9 (n)10 (i)-2.8 (c)4.8 ( )-40 (t)-1.9 (o)9 (x)-9 (i)-2 (c)3.9 (i)-2 (t)-12 (y)29.1 ( )-19 (s)-1.9 (t)-2 (ud)9.9 (ies )-49.9 (on)9 ( )]TJ Objections to portions of a document request do not excuse the responding party from producing those documents to which there is no objection. (13)Tj )2 (11)2 ( in )9.1 (P)-4.8 (l)-2 (a)14 (i)-1.9 (n)10.7 (t)7.1 (i)8.9 (f)2.2 (f)3 (s\222)1.8 ( A)11.1 (m)-1.8 (e)4.7 (n)9.2 (de)4.8 (d a)3.2 (nd S)6 (up)9.9 (ple)11 (men)11.9 (t)-1.9 (a)3 (l )7.9 (R)-3.8 (e)14 (que)4.8 (s)8.1 (t)8.9 (s )-1.8 (f)1.1 (or)3 ( )10 (A)2 (dm)-1.9 (i)-1.1 (ss)-3 (i)-2 (ons)-1.8 ( \()3.7 (J)-10.9 (une)3 ( )]TJ Notwithstanding said objections, no documents. They produced redacted documents, no privilege log yet. ET ( )Tj When Do I Have to Bring a Motion to Compel Written Discovery? T* T* [(3)6.8 (4)6.8 (8)21.806 (1)8.095 (2)6.899 (\\)23.898 (6)21.806 (2)6.899 (6)21.793 (1)5.604 (3)21.806 (8)6.8 (3)8.095 (. ^ci|kFC5iCPTZGhG9#cvwz&>2/DxHI4l zl}RtvNM,rru-mIi1n.~,aX2l:Kz pKbQ}"nDo,4noiI[6Qv,m, ,%}?T\8 Y Xem)f,]jmGnVYye^|lY5j2)_`gG<7fGyjW$6]k@ MB-Mm~S-O$ pUxqHCxPiJSN (26)Tj q The originals of all such memoranda and documents are maintained in the principal investigatory and case files, and any handwritten annotations or comments that may be added to such documents by others in the Division would be protected by the work product doctrine, governmental deliberative process privilege, or other applicable protection. T* [(M)-1.8 (onsa)2.8 (n)-10.8 (t)-1.2 (o )]TJ (3)Tj q Judith M. Kinney (DSB # 3643) Assistant United States Attorney 1201 Market Street, Suite 1100 Wilmington, DE 19801 (302) 573-6277, This document is available in two formats: this web page (for browsing content) and. /TT0 12 Tf /Font 18 0 R BT [(A)-7.1 (D)1.9 (M)3.1 (IT)-3.9 (S)]TJ (a) Any documents or category of documents produced in response to a demand for inspection, copying, testing, or sampling shall be identified with the specific request number to which the documents respond. At the March 8, 1999 conference with the Court, Defendant's counsel suggested that interview memoranda were discoverable. /TT1 12 Tf C)-2.1 (i)-2.1 (v. P)-4.8 (r)3.7 (oc)4.1 (. Responding party objects that it is unduly burdensome and overbroad. In addition, such materials often summarize the reasons the Division conducted the interview, characterize the importance of the information learned in the interview, draw inferences based on that information, describe the author's impressions concerning the cooperativeness, credibility, or knowledge of the interviewee, and/or identify potential areas of further inquiry. )]TJ [(r)3 (e)4.8 (s)-1.7 (t)-2 (a)4.7 (t)-2.7 (e)4.7 (d i)-1.9 (n f)2.9 (ul)-1.9 (l)-2 (. ET 44.87 0 Td T* (21)Tj 58.19 726.6 32.4 -673.2 re endobj (13)Tj Standard objections to discovery requests under the FRCP and the Cal. [(Mo)-2 (ns)-13 (a)4.8 (nt)-2.8 (o )]TJ 1304/1307 (S.D.N.Y., Feb. 18, 2017), the plaintiff requested the production of almost a decade of emails, letters, and marketing materials. Objectives are steps towards goals. T* Therefore, there are no "statements" as that term is defined. BT >> (13)Tj [( t)-1.9 (hi)-2.1 (s R)-3.3 (e)3.1 (que)4 (st)-3.9 (. ET 7. /Kids [24 0 R 25 0 R 26 0 R 27 0 R 28 0 R 29 0 R 30 0 R 31 0 R 32 0 R 33 0 R 64 0 obj BT BT (18)Tj stream /Count 14 Plaintiff objects to Definition No. (M)Tj C.C.P. T* /Length 138 0 R T* q x+ | (5)Tj h 21 0 obj /Length 131 0 R 1) litigators are not sending them. 0 -24 TD (14)Tj /Icircumflex /Idieresis /Eth /Ntilde /Ograve /Oacute /Ocircumflex /Otilde /Odieresis /multiply Should any such disclosure by Plaintiff occur, it is inadvertent and shall not constitute a waiver of any privilege. /Fm0 Do Similarly, the subpoena recipient may file a motion to quash or modify the subpoena in the court where compliance is required. 20 0 obj /ProcSet [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI] )]TJ 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 6.11554 36 cm /Filter /FlateDecode /TT1 12 Tf /TT0 12 Tf << 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 81.6004 679.0819 Tm q (17)Tj /PieceInfo 5 0 R /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /TT0 8.03 Tf /Length 137 0 R Meaningful steps towards business goals that are accomplished by a project. (11)Tj Endnote. [(Mons)-1.4 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o obj)-1.1 (e)3.1 (c)3.9 (t)-1.8 (s )-2 (t)-3.1 (o t)-1.1 (he)3.1 (se)1.9 ( R)-2.8 (e)4.7 (que)4 (st)-3.8 (s )-2 (a)2.9 (s )-1.8 (un)-1.8 (r)-8.8 (e)4.8 (a)4 (so)-1.8 (na)1.3 (b)-10 (l)-11.1 (y)19 ( c)4 (um)-1.9 (ul)-2 (a)4 (t)-2 (i)-2 (ve)4 ( )-9.1 (a)3.9 (nd/)-1.9 (or)2.1 ( )]TJ -154.07 -24 Td T* /TT0 12 Tf f /Artifact <>BDC (26)Tj 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 139.2004 75.2636 Tm >> 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 6.020233 36 cm )-10.8 ( )-9.1 ( )]TJ RESPONSE: Complainant contends that the following relationships to the Complainant are held for persons identified in Interrogatory No. ET T* /Length 130 0 R (18)Tj Dl'|hI;%C^FqT%hE3V*S:.1~~K~|b\?q,E+9N0pg 327.154 -48 Td [( t)-1.9 (hi)-2.1 (s )-1.8 (R)-4.8 (e)4.8 (que)4 (st)-3.8 (;)-2 ( )9 (Mo)-1.8 (ns)-2.8 (a)3.9 (nt)-1.9 (o\222)2.9 (s )-1.8 (a)3.9 (ni)-1.9 (m)-2.9 (a)4.8 (l)-1.9 ( )]TJ (10)Tj "Verbatim statements of a third party" include, but are not limited to, transcripts of the depositions of third parties, oral statements from any third party or its counsel, and correspondence from third parties to Plaintiff. 55 0 obj (M)Tj q )]TJ 4 0 obj )2 ( )]TJ /Pages 8 0 R 4. endobj T* P)-4.7 (ur)3.7 (su)-1.8 (a)3 (nt)-1.9 ( t)-2 (o )-10 (t)-2 (he)3.1 ( C)-2.1 (a)3.1 (l)-1.9 (i)-1.2 (f)2.1 (or)2.9 (ni)-1.8 (a)3.9 ( C)-3 (ode)4.8 ( )]TJ A specific response may repeat a general objection for emphasis or some other reason. -72 -24 Td 5. T* T* 111.6 0 Td f 0 -24 TD Attendance at such interviews was limited to, at most, the interviewee, Antitrust Division attorneys and staff, counsel for the interviewee (in some interviews), and a potential testifying expert economist (in some interviews). T* -240.96 -24 Td (28)Tj Ideally, the third party should serve objections no less than three days before the date of the deposition or the due date of the requested documents. /Parent 15 0 R (27)Tj f Example Request for Production of Documents. Continue Reading Are You Following Up on Your Opponents Discovery Responses? >> /CropBox [0 0 612 792] 18 0 obj (5. 44.77 0 Td ET )]TJ [(c)4 (onduc)4.8 (t)-2.8 (e)4.8 (d i)-1.9 (nde)3.9 (p)-10.8 (e)4.8 (nde)4 (nt)-1.9 ( a)-6.8 (ni)-2 (m)-2 (a)3.9 (l)-2 ( c)3.9 (hr)3.9 (oni)-1.9 (c)3.9 ( t)-1.9 (ox)-10.9 (i)-1.1 (c)3 (i)-1.9 (t)-12 (y)30 ( st)-13.9 (udi)-2 (e)3.9 (s )-1.8 (on)-1.8 ( g)8.1 (l)-21 (y)19.9 (phosa)1.2 (t)-1.9 (e)4 ( b)-9.1 (e)3.9 (t)-1.9 (w)-8.9 (e)4.8 (e)4 (n 1991 a)3.1 (nd 2017, )]TJ T* Judges have been saying it for years, and their tolerance for deaf ears is ebbing: Throw away the boilerplate. 41 0 obj /GS0 gs 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 4.5757 36 Tm ( )Tj 1 0 0 1 152.3695068 766 cm 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 5.085876 36 cm Monsanto's responses and objections to plaintiff's Requests are made solely for the purposes of discovery in this action. [(obj)-1.1 (e)3 (c)4.1 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.1 (ons )-2 (a)2.9 (nd gr)3.9 (ounds )-1.8 (t)-3.8 (ha)4.8 (t)-1.9 ( w)1.9 (oul)-1.9 (d r)2.9 (e)3.1 (quire)4.9 ( t)-2.7 (h)-9.2 (e)3.9 ( e)3.1 (x)-9 (c)3.9 (l)-1.9 (usi)-4.9 (on f)3.8 (r)3 (om)-1.9 ( e)3 (vid)-2 (e)2 (nc)4.9 (e)4 ( o)-10.8 (f)3 ( a)-6 (n)-10 (y)20.8 ( st)-3.8 (a)3.9 (t)-1.9 (e)3 (ment o)-10.9 (r)3.8 ( ot)-2.8 (he)4.8 (r)3 ( )]TJ ET /TT0 8.03 Tf ( )Tj -349.92 -24 Td 4 regarding "document" or "documents" to the extent that it purports to impose obligations greater than those set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. It's time to renew your membership and keep access to free CLE, valuable publications and more. (26)Tj /PDFDocEncoding 39 0 R ( )Tj 2031.050, that allow the propounding party to ask for updated information bearing on answers already made and later acquired or discovered documents, tangible things, land or other property.. [( Mo)-1.8 (ns)-2 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o i)-1.1 (nc)3.1 (or)2.9 (por)3.9 (a)3.2 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 (s )-2 (b)-20.1 (y)19 ( )-9.9 (r)3.8 (e)4 (f)-7.7 (e)4.7 (r)2.2 (e)4 (n)-9.1 (c)3.9 (e)-5.9 ( G)1.9 (e)3.1 (ne)4 (r)-6 (a)3.1 (l)-2 ( O)2 (bj)-2 (e)4 (c)4.8 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (ons )-2 (1-)1.8 (6 )-9.9 (he)3.1 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( a)3.1 (s i)-2 (f)2 ( )]TJ [(77-)3 (4)10.8 (20)10 (, di)-1.9 (d not)-2.9 ( r)3.8 (e)4 (por)2.1 (t)-1.9 ( a)4 ( )10 (ki)-1.1 (dne)-6.9 (y)20.8 ( )19.2 (t)-1.9 (um)-2 (or)2.9 ( f)3.8 (o)-9.9 (r)2.1 ( c)4 (ont)-1.9 (r)2.9 (ol)-1.9 ( a)-5.2 (ni)7 (m)-1.8 (a)4.7 (l)-2.7 ( N)2.7 (o. /Annots [] << 2. (7. /TT0 12 Tf stream (1)Tj << /Parent 15 0 R q [(da)4 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (d 9/)-2 (4/)-2 (84 f)2.9 (r)3.9 (om)-2.7 ( W)-6.1 (i)-1.1 (l)-2 (l)-2 (i)-2.8 (a)13.8 (m)-1.9 ( D)-7.1 (y)19 (kst)-2.8 (r)2.1 (a)4.8 (, P)-4.7 (h.D)1.9 (., To)1.8 (x)-8.1 (i)-2 (c)-6.9 (ol)-2 (og)-10 (y)20.8 ( )-10.8 (B)7 (r)3.8 (a)3.1 (n)-9.9 (c)4.8 (h, EP)-2.8 (A)2.8 ( H)2 (a)3.1 (z)-5 (a)-6.9 (r)3 (d E)1.8 (va)4 (l)-1.9 (ua)3.1 (t)-1.1 (i)-2 (on )]TJ endstream /Filter /FlateDecode [(A)1.1 (D)2 (M)4 (IT)-4.8 (S)]TJ T* stream T* 100.55 0 Td To the extent this request calls for notes and/or memoranda prepared by the potential testifying expert economist, Plaintiff objects to the request as premature and expressly reserves the right to supplement, clarify, revise, or correct any or all responses to the request, and to assert additional objections or privileges, in one or more subsequent supplemental response(s) in accordance with the time period for exchanging expert reports set by the Court. 36 -48 Td T* )25.903 (1)]TJ /TT0 12 Tf q )Tj /TT1 12 Tf /ITXT (2.1.7) /Parent 15 0 R 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 313.677 86.2909 Tm Company-focused candidate. [(pl)-1.1 (a)3.1 (i)-2 (nt)-1.1 (i)-2 (f)2.9 (f)2.2 ( pur)2.9 (por)3.9 (t)-2.7 (s)-1.1 ( t)-2 (o de)4.8 (f)3 (i)-1.9 (n)-10 (e)3 ( t)-1.8 (he)3.9 ( t)-1.9 (e)4.7 (r)3 (m)-1.9 ( b)-20.8 (y)20.7 ( c)4 (i)-1.9 (t)-2 (i)-2.9 (n)-9.1 (g)9 ( a)4.9 ( f)2.2 (i)-1.1 (v)-10.9 (e)4 (-)3.8 (pa)-6.7 (g)9.9 (e)4 ( b)-9.1 (a)3.9 (c)3.1 (k)-9 (gr)2.9 (ound doc)3.1 (u)-9.9 (m)-2 (e)4.8 (nt)-2.8 ( t)-2 (ha)4.8 (t)-2.8 ( doe)4.8 (s )-1.8 (no)-1.8 (t)-3.7 ( )]TJ ET >> ( )Tj Accordingly, Plaintiff objects to this request as overbroad and burdensome. /Annots [] /Rotate 0 /TT0 12 Tf As noted above, such a log would include virtually every internal document created by Plaintiff over the course of Plaintiff's civil investigation of Dentsply's distribution and marketing of artificial teeth. BT T* 117.349 708 Td /Type /Page 67.32 0 Td 482.85 624.61 Td T* endobj GENERAL OBJECTIONS 1. /Annots [] /Fm0 Do Rule of Court Changes for Remote Depositions. Plaintiff objects to each instruction, definition, document request, and interrogatory to the extent that it purports to impose any requirement or discovery obligation greater than or different from those under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the applicable Rules and Orders of the Court. [(2)-1.296 ( )]TJ x%0>7P{o2:Krc\_xJ5= +\n"bL}';.b.5|4}bHXVvK! Assume you receive the following response to your Requests for Production of Documents: Responding party hereby incorporates its general objections as if fully stated herein. . /ProcSet [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI] (20)Tj pD1visp[n5pL3lQtM;-a-VO}]ny]t;pcgj(q =vwVB~dm$ 4H^~#Ead4*KSj:sLGLvBSHr$$UKe;vtT='l6tdfIKq5'H=l#?JzT=A?qjf)$d?RTia&p%NoD]FYD/}@J!>1Za{JZ:LigFmhHgSLI a^xrJgr,6l_. Q T* (18)Tj /Type /Page (12)Tj (2)Tj << endobj (9)Tj -394.07 -24 Td /Font 135 0 R (2)Tj 26 April 2023 . 7. Responding party objects to this request as it seeks documents that are not within defendants possession, custody, or control. f Plaintiff objects to each document request and interrogatory that is overly broad, unduly burdensome, or not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. [(pl)-1.1 (a)3.1 (i)-2 (nt)-1.1 (i)-2 (f)2.9 (f)2.2 ( pur)2.9 (por)3.9 (t)-2.7 (s)-1.1 ( t)-2 (o de)4.8 (f)3 (i)-1.9 (n)-10 (e)3 ( t)-1.8 (he)3.9 ( t)-1.9 (e)4.7 (r)3 (m)-1.9 ( b)-20.8 (y)20.7 ( c)4 (i)-1.9 (t)-2 (i)-2.9 (n)-9.1 (g)9 ( a)4.9 ( f)2.2 (i)-1.1 (v)-10.9 (e)4 (-)3.8 (pa)-6.7 (g)9.9 (e)4 ( b)-9.1 (a)3.9 (c)3.1 (k)-9 (gr)2.9 (ound doc)3.1 (u)-9.9 (m)-2 (e)4.8 (nt)-2.8 ( t)-2 (ha)4.8 (t)-2.8 ( doe)4.8 (s )-1.8 (no)-1.8 (t)-3.7 ( )]TJ See my blog Make Sure you are aware of the New Document Response Requirementsfor an updated analysis. The serving party must file its motion to compel in the court where compliance is required. /Contents [92 0 R 93 0 R 94 0 R] (27)Tj /TT0 11.03 Tf T* (3)Tj Mo)-2 (ns)-3 (a)4 (nt)-1.9 (o )]TJ 2 2. /TT0 12 Tf << stream T* [(W)-5.1 (i)-2.9 (l)-2 (l)-1.9 (i)-1.2 (a)3.1 (m)-2 ( D)-7.1 (y)29.9 (kst)-4.6 (r)3.7 (a)3.2 (, P)-3.1 (h.D)1.9 (., )-10.8 (To)1.8 (x)-8.1 (i)-2.9 (c)4.8 (ol)-1.9 (ogy)19.9 ( )-10.7 (B)7.7 (r)3 (a)3.1 (n)-9 (c)3.9 (h, EP)-1.9 (A)-8.9 ( H)2 (a)4.8 (z)-6.8 (a)4 (r)3.8 (d Ev)2 (a)4.1 (lu)-2 (a)2 (t)-1.9 (i)-1.1 (on Divis)-12.9 (i)-1.1 (on, )]TJ See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(3); Hickman v. Taylor 329 U.S. 495 (1947). Plaintiff further objects to this request as duplicative, overbroad, and burdensome even if the term "reflected" were construed more narrowly to include only documents containing or including verbatim statements. [(R)2 (E)-2.1 (S)-4 (P)10 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (D)2.9 (I)-1.7 (N)-7.2 (G)7.1 ( )-9.1 (P)10.9 (A)2 (R)2 (T)-12.9 (Y)1.1 (:)-6.1 ( )-1050.8 (D)1.9 (e)4 (f)-6.9 (e)3.9 (n)-3.9 (d)-3.2 (an)-4.8 (t)3.7 ( M)4 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (S)-3.9 (A)1.9 (N)2 (T)-2.9 (O)-2 ( C)1.9 (O)-1.9 (M)3.9 (PA)3.2 (N)2 (Y)2 ( )-9.1 ( )]TJ T* [(of)3 ( st)-4 (ud)-9.9 (y)20.7 ( B)6.1 (D)2 (N)2.9 (-)3 (77-)2.2 (42)10.8 (0 w)2 (e)3.2 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( )9.2 (c)4.8 (om)-1.9 (pou)9.1 (nd-)13 (r)3.8 (e)4 (l)-1.9 (a)13.9 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (d. \()2.1 (M)9.9 (O)2 (N)1.1 (G)2.1 (L)21.8 (Y)2 (04276)10 (044)9.2 (\))3.8 ( )-240.7 ([)-6.2 (Th)1.8 (i)8.9 (s)-1.8 ( R)-3 (e)4.8 (q)9.1 (ue)4.9 (s)8.2 (t)-1.9 ( i)-1.2 (s )]TJ However, one of the objections I hadnt seen before: No preface or instruction shall be included with a set of interrogatories. Plaintiffs object that the Request seeks documents that are work product, attorney-client communications, and/or documents that are protected under Rule 26(b)(4), including draft reports and communications between Plaintiffs' attorneys and the expert witness. /TT0 9.96 Tf q [(Mons)-1.4 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o obj)-1.1 (e)3.1 (c)3.9 (t)-1.8 (s )-2 (t)-3.1 (o pl)-1.1 (a)3.1 (i)-2 (nt)-1.1 (i)-2 (f)2 (f)3.1 (\222)2.9 (s )-1.8 (R)-3.9 (e)3.9 (que)4.9 (st)-3.8 (s)-1.9 ( t)-2 (o t)-2 (he)3.9 ( e)4.9 (x)-10.8 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 (nt)-2 ( t)-1.1 (he)-6 (y)19.9 ( )-10.8 (c)4.8 (a)4 (l)-1.9 (l)-2 ( f)2.9 (or)2.1 ( th)-2 (e)2 ( di)-1.8 (sc)2.7 (l)-11.9 (os)-1.1 (ur)3.8 (e)4 ( )]TJ (21)Tj -48.829 -12 Td [1] (13)Tj /PageElement 38 0 R /TT0 12 Tf 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 140.5293 75.2636 Tm /Encoding 17 0 R (26)Tj Responding party objects to this request as it does not seek relevant documents or documents reasonably calculated to the discovery of admissible evidence. /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] T* endobj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] Plaintiff objects to each instruction, definition, document request, and interrogatory as overbroad and unduly burdensome to the extent it seeks documents or information that are readily or more accessible to Defendant from Defendant's own files, from documents or information in Defendant's possession, or from documents or information that Defendant previously produced to Plaintiff. /Count 2 q 88.55 0 Td [(D)2 (E)-3.8 (N)2.8 (IE)-5.8 (S)]TJ T* q T* /Contents [100 0 R 101 0 R 102 0 R] [(R)2 (E)-2.1 (S)-4 (P)10 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (S)-3.9 (E)-2.1 (:)]TJ See Bihun v. AT&T Info. Q endobj /Annots [] T* T* 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 83.0246 679.0819 Tm A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means youve safely connected to the .gov website. f 25.424 -24 Td >> Q To the extent that "during" is intended to mean "at the time of," Plaintiff objects to this definition as overbroad because it would call for materials unrelated to this action. f << T* Q /Type /Page [(A)2 (dm)-2 (i)-2.8 (t)-2 ( t)-2 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( E)10.9 (P)-3 (A)1.9 (\222)2.1 (s )9 (H)2 (a)13.9 (z)-5.9 (a)4 (r)13 (d Ev)2 (a)15 (l)-1.9 (ua)13.9 (t)7.1 (i)-1.9 (on D)1.9 (i)-1.9 (v)10.8 (i)-1.9 (si)-4 (on, on)9 ( or)3 ( a)4.9 (bou)10 (t)-2.8 ( )9.9 (S)-3 (e)3 (p)10.9 (t)-1.9 (e)13.9 (m)-2 (be)4 (r)2.1 ( 4, )]TJ T* [(g)10.8 (l)-11.9 (y)29.1 (phosa)2.8 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 ( )-229 (be)13.9 (t)-1.9 (w)1.9 (e)3.2 (e)13.9 (n )-199 (199)9.9 (1 )-200.8 (t)-2 (h)10.8 (r)3 (oug)10 (h )-209.9 (2017. /ExtGState 145 0 R W n 2031.030(c) states: Each demand in a set shall be separately set forth, identified by number or letter, and shall do all of the following: << Q W n T* (2)Tj >> [(D)2.8 (E)-3.7 (N)2.7 (I)-1.8 (E)-2.9 (S)]TJ 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 82.1952 679.0819 Tm endobj )]TJ endobj 11 0 obj /TT1 12 Tf q 2030.070 and C.C.P. >> 3 0 obj )10.8 ( )]TJ /Rotate 0 /odieresis /divide /oslash /ugrave /uacute /ucircumflex /udieresis /yacute /thorn /ydieresis] T* At the March 8, 1999 conference with the Court, Defendant's counsel suggested that interview memoranda were discoverable. Library of Connecticut Civil Discovery Forms - Connecticut Law Connecticut Law Tribune 2011-11-15 [( Mo)-1.8 (ns)-2 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o i)-1.1 (nc)3.1 (or)2.9 (por)3.9 (a)3.2 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 (s )-2 (b)-20.1 (y)19 ( )-9.9 (r)3.8 (e)4 (f)-7.7 (e)4.7 (r)2.2 (e)4 (n)-9.1 (c)3.9 (e)-5.9 ( G)1.9 (e)3.1 (ne)4 (r)-6 (a)3.1 (l)-2 ( O)2 (bj)-2 (e)4 (c)4.8 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (ons )-2 (1-)1.8 (6 )-9.9 (he)3.1 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( a)3.1 (s i)-2 (f)2 ( )]TJ (5)Tj /Annots [] SET NUMBER: ONE (1) To Plaintiff, Acme, Inc . (24)Tj 0 -446.832 l 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 6.020233 36 cm I have received many requests over the years and the next couple of blogs will be responding to some of these requests. /florin /fraction /guilsinglleft /guilsinglright /minus /perthousand /quotedblbase /quotedblleft /quotedblright /quoteleft /Artifact <>BDC 3 to refer to "Civil Investigative Demand No. [(D)2 (i)-2 (vi)-1.1 (si)-4 (on c)3.9 (onc)3.1 (l)-1.9 (ude)3.9 (d t)-1.9 (ha)4.8 (t)-2.8 ( t)-2 (he)4.8 ( r)3 (e)3.2 (na)3.9 (l)-1.9 ( t)-2 (ubul)-1.1 (e)3 ( )-9 (a)3.9 (de)3.2 (nom)-2 (a)4 (s)-10.1 ( f)2.9 (ound i)-1.9 (n t)-2.9 (he)4.8 ( m)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (d-)3.8 ( a)3.1 (nd hig)7.9 (h-)3 (dos)-11.8 (e)4 ( )-9.1 (g)9.1 (r)3.8 (oup )]TJ endstream /CropBox [0 0 612 792] These interviews were conducted by attorneys and staff of Plaintiff. All such information, prepared in anticipation of litigation and not disclosed or otherwise maintained in a way that is inconsistent with the purpose of the privilege, is protected by the work product doctrine. /TT1 12 Tf [(ont)-2 (h or)2.9 ( l)-1.9 (ong)9.1 (e)4.8 (r)2.2 ( )-10 (a)4.8 (ni)-2.7 (m)-2 (a)4.7 (l)-2.7 ( c)-6.1 (hr)3 (oni)-2 (c)3.9 ( t)-1.9 (ox)-9.1 (i)-2.9 (c)4.8 (i)-1.9 (t)-12 (y)29.9 ( st)-3.8 (udi)-2.9 (e)4.8 (s )-1.8 (t)-2.9 (h)-10 (a)3 (t)-1.9 ( i)-1.1 (t)-2 ( ha)3 (s c)3 (onduc)4.9 (t)-2.8 (e)4.8 (d on )-10.8 (g)10.8 (l)-11.9 (y)19 (p)-9 (hos)-1.9 (a)4.8 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 ( )-10.8 (be)4.8 (t)-2.7 (w)2.7 (e)-6.8 (e)4 (n )]TJ << T* /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] (14)Tj Q Plaintiff incorporates by reference every general objection set forth above into each specific response set forth below. (5)Tj Q 0.428 -446.832 l Q T* T* 100.44 792 0.83 -792 re q )-1839.167 (A)2 (dm)-2 (i)-2.8 (t)-2 ( )-150 (t)-2 (ha)4.8 (t)-2.8 ( )-149.1 (M)-1.1 (ons)-1.8 (a)4.8 (nt)-2 (o )-149.9 (ha)13.9 (s )-151.8 (not)-2 ( )-150.9 (c)3.9 (on)10 (duc)14 (ted )-148.9 (a)4.8 ( )-139.9 (c)3 (hr)3 (on)-9 (i)-2.9 (c)4.8 ( )-150 (t)-1.9 (oxi)-2 (c)3.9 (i)-2 (t)-12 (y)29.1 ( )-119.9 (s)-10.1 (t)-2.9 (ud)-19.1 (y)19 ( )-129.9 (o)-10 (f)3.8 ( )-160.8 (a)3.9 (n)-19 (y)19 ( )-149 (of)2.9 ( )-150.8 (t)-1.1 (he)3 ( )]TJ acquire the most less latency era to download any of our books afterward this one. /TT0 12 Tf T* (8)Tj T* /Length 132 0 R f Continue Reading Avoiding the Technical Mistakes When Drafting Written Discovery. << 104.03 792 0.83 -792 re >> /Type /Page (17)Tj 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 136.9293 505.091 Tm /TT0 12 Tf The materials thus provide at least a snapshot of the mental impressions, conclusions, opinions, and legal theories of the Government personnel attending the interviews. 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 5.085876 36 cm Q The interviews were memorialized by notes and/or memoranda written by Antitrust Division attorneys and staff. When does the 45 days to bring a motion to compel further responses to RPD begin? Plaintiff further objects to this interrogatory as vague, ambiguous, overbroad, and unduly burdensome to the extent it asks Plaintiff to identify in detail "all facts known to these individuals and entities that are relevant to the DOJ's claims against Dentsply in this matter."
Does Jeffrey Harrington Die On The Haves And Have Nots,
Nissan Stadium Club Level,
Articles S