>> /Type /StructElem /StructParents 11 >> /P 10 0 R << /Pg 21 0 R Form 4 - MEDICAL MALPRACTICE - INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT. << /Pg 30 0 R endobj 64 0 obj /P 10 0 R 2011) (holding that postings on a plaintiffs Facebook account, if relevant, are not precluded from discovery because the plaintiff utilized privacy settings); Tompkins v. Detroit Metro. >> /Type /StructElem It is duplicative of Form Interrogatory 3.1 which was served by Madera Framing on November 24, 2015 and responded to on January 15, 2016, by Responding Party. 115 0 R 116 0 R 117 0 R 118 0 R 119 0 R 120 0 R 121 0 R 122 0 R 123 0 R 124 0 R /S /Link 117 0 obj /P 10 0 R << /S /P /P 472 0 R Notice of Removal in the United States District Courts At A Glance, Case Management Statement in the United States District CourtAt A Glance. 0000051906 00000 n >> /Pg 34 0 R >> /K [38] /Type /StructElem /S /P /Type /StructElem >> 78 0 obj << /Type /Page /Filter /FlateDecode >> /Type /StructElem 103 0 obj /Type /StructElem endobj 65 0 obj /P 476 0 R /S /P /P 472 0 R /Group 404 0 R 88 0 obj 213 0 obj /Type /StructElem >> 164 0 obj /S /P <>stream /Type /StructElem 215 0 R 216 0 R 217 0 R 218 0 R 219 0 R 220 0 R 221 0 R 222 0 R 223 0 R 224 0 R 14 0 obj /K [8] endobj After the trial court denied its motion, the defendant filed narrower discovery requests. >> 671 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[]/Index[655 32]/Info 654 0 R/Length 81/Prev 387279/Root 656 0 R/Size 687/Type/XRef/W[1 2 1]>>stream << /Parent 6 0 R /P 10 0 R >> /P 10 0 R /K [9] << /Contents [380 0 R 381 0 R 382 0 R] /Type /StructElem This Standard Document has integrated notes with important explanations on how to draft common interrogatories used in Florida litigation and the usual defined terms and instructions. >> /Pg 26 0 R << /Type /StructElem >> >> /S /P 186 0 obj /K [0] endobj 265 0 obj /S /P /A 439 0 R /Footnote /Note /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R /Resources 418 0 R /K [9] /K [11] /Type /StructElem endobj 0000230525 00000 n 183 0 obj /S /P 0000005343 00000 n /Type /Page << >> << >> I. /Type /Page A party may propound to another party thirty (30) interrogatories, including those from the official forms or custom drafted ones. /Type /Page /S /P >> /Type /StructElem >> /K 25 << >> P. 1.340(a). << /S /P 107 0 obj 0000008012 00000 n 202 0 obj MOTIONS TO COMPEL, FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER, OR TO QUASH. endobj /Pg 16 0 R Rule 1.340 (a) provides the following with regard to the timing for submitting and responding to interrogatories. 292 0 obj /Annots [] endobj /Pg 13 0 R 4 0 obj /P 10 0 R endobj /P 450 0 R /P 474 0 R << endobj /K [1] Fla. R. Civ. /P 476 0 R /K [4] /P 10 0 R /Source (WeJXFxNO4fJduyUMetTcP9+oaONfINN4+d7N38LePWQR8EmtF1G6bMwxLnhv5WNPB9khgm8VtCFmyd8gIrwOjQRAIjPsWhM4vgMCV8KvVF/K8leW6+gzDazQXX6SMk83Uf9DFsd34DM3GEg=) endobj /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem Aninterrogatory is not objectionable becausean answer to it involves an opinion or con-tention that relates to fact or the applica-tion of law to fact, or would be based oninformation obtained or legal theories de-veloped in anticipation of litigation or inpreparation of trial." /K [2] /Type /StructElem << 113 0 obj /Type /StructElem >> >> /Group 364 0 R hbbd```b``z"gIil &Sb`2,`rL`L*dPL@A@H'@ 8 /P 322 0 R << /K [0] >> 0000006573 00000 n endobj /Contents [375 0 R 376 0 R 377 0 R] /Pg 13 0 R >> /Type /StructElem /P 472 0 R >> endobj /K [3] endobj /S /P endobj >> << << /Pg 13 0 R >> endobj 0000123483 00000 n >> endobj 82 0 R 83 0 R 84 0 R 85 0 R] 10 0 obj hbbd``b`z$g7 /Type /StructElem /Pg 25 0 R << /K [19] >> /P 451 0 R 261 0 obj %%EOF 61 0 obj << endobj 0000051500 00000 n 18 0 obj /P 10 0 R 68 0 obj For reprints, contacttamontemuro@mdwcg.com. /Pg 15 0 R >> The trial court ultimately compelled the plaintiff to produce, among other things, all photographs associated with the account for the two years prior to the incident to the present. 10 [126 0 R 127 0 R 128 0 R 129 0 R 130 0 R] endobj 206 0 obj /K [9] 216 0 obj 6 0 obj >> >> /K [2] Originally developed by a group of trial attorneys, this handbook on civil discovery practice in the United States District Court, Middle District of Florida, updated in 2001, and again in 2015, attempts to supplement the rules and decisions by capturing this custom and practice. /Pg 27 0 R RESPONSE: Complainant contends that the following relationships to the Complainant are held for persons identified in Interrogatory No. 125 0 obj << 243 0 obj 165 0 R 166 0 R 167 0 R 168 0 R 169 0 R 170 0 R 171 0 R 172 0 R 173 0 R 174 0 R /Pg 13 0 R /P 454 0 R /P 10 0 R << /K [5] /Type /StructElem << 155 0 obj /K [3] endobj /S /P /S /P >> P. 1.280(e). /Type /StructElem /S /P /Contents [370 0 R 371 0 R 372 0 R] 0000000016 00000 n >> << /S /P 66 0 R 67 0 R 68 0 R 69 0 R 70 0 R 71 0 R 72 0 R 73 0 R 74 0 R 75 0 R /K [3] /P 10 0 R 260 0 obj A sample set of interrogatories that may be used in a Florida circuit court civil case. endobj /S /P /Pg 13 0 R /S /Table 0000173956 00000 n 137 0 obj /Type /StructElem 199 0 obj /P 472 0 R /S /P <]>> /Pg 34 0 R /S /LBody << /Contents [400 0 R 401 0 R 402 0 R] /Annots [] >> endobj /S /P /Type /StructElem endobj /A 467 0 R 098595 Attorneys Ad Litem for the minor Offices at Grand Bay Plaza 2665 Bayshore Drive Suite 220-14 Miami, Florida 33133 Telephone: 305-373-3101 Facsimile: 305-381-8734 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been served via :Fx)QP/IZ}:&_M)u"; _PB:8#\j*D2#flIc.TJsrrq2. /Tabs /S /Type /StructElem /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] >> 46 0 R 47 0 R 48 0 R 49 0 R 50 0 R 51 0 R 52 0 R 53 0 R 54 0 R 55 0 R /K [29] /Resources 433 0 R /Pg 29 0 R /Type /StructElem /P 477 0 R >> /Pg 23 0 R /Type /StructElem << << /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem 192 0 obj /K [5] /Pg 34 0 R 298 0 obj << endobj >> << /P 10 0 R But if are a plaintiff's lawyer, you must know this rule. /K [10] >> endobj /Type /StructElem /S /P (For an example, see our sample interrogatory and answer number 14, below.) /Type /StructElem << /P 10 0 R 387 (E.D. endobj endobj << /S /P /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem endobj /P 10 0 R /K [3] /StructParents 3 /P 10 0 R >> /K [0] /S /P A party and counsel ordinarily have complied with their obligation to respond to interrogatories if they have: Responded to the interrogatories within the time set by the governing rule, stipulation, or court-ordered extension; Conducted a reasonable inquiry, including a review of documents likely to have information necessary to respondto interrogatories; Objected specifically to objectionable interrogatories; Submitted the answers under oath, signed by the appropriate party representative. /P 10 0 R /Pg 25 0 R P. 1.340(b). /K [1] /Pg 26 0 R /S /P >> /Type /StructElem 299 0 obj /P 10 0 R 203 0 obj /S /LBody 300 0 R 301 0 R 302 0 R 303 0 R 304 0 R 305 0 R 306 0 R 307 0 R 308 0 R 309 0 R /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem >> endobj 72 0 obj 149 0 obj 33 0 R 34 0 R] /Group 384 0 R /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem /P 473 0 R /Type /StructElem /Pg 29 0 R /Type /StructElem /S /P << << << /P 10 0 R /S /P /S /LBody /K [1] /K [31] 185 0 obj /Type /Page /Type /StructElem 221 0 obj /Type /StructElem endobj 294 0 obj /S /P endobj /Resources 378 0 R /K [16] 16 0 obj /Type /StructElem /K [5] /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem 322 0 obj /Contents [325 0 R 326 0 R 327 0 R] << 247 0 obj /K [10] << /K [4] /P 10 0 R /K [11] 0000177635 00000 n >> >> /Type /StructElem >> /K [6] Nevertheless, as support for its general conclusions, the Fourth District relied on cases involving the discovery of social media materials beyond photographs. /StructParents 8 << endobj endobj Specific objections should be matched to specific requests. /K [4] %PDF-1.5 /Type /StructElem /S /P 31 0 obj << 320 0 obj /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /Contents [340 0 R 341 0 R 342 0 R] /Type /Page << endstream endobj startxref >> 170 0 obj /Pg 16 0 R /S /P /P 476 0 R << /Type /StructElem >> endobj /Group 399 0 R 275 0 obj /Pg 25 0 R 11 [131 0 R 132 0 R 133 0 R 134 0 R] endobj endobj /P 10 0 R endobj << /Type /StructElem /P 474 0 R /P 10 0 R ATTORNEY ADVERTISING pursuant to New York RPC 7.1 /S /P /S /P endobj endobj << /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem endobj << >> /S /P << These "general objections" generally include claims that the discovery requests are: 1) overbroad; 2) burdensome; 3) not relevant nor likely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; 4) not appropriately limited in time; 5) seek information protected by the attorney client and/or work product privilege; and 6) not limited to products or issues which are substantially similar to the . startxref /Type /StructElem 148 0 obj /Type /StructElem 92 0 obj endobj /S /P Subject to and without waiving endobj /P 456 0 R /P 458 0 R 75 0 obj Specific Objections All objections to discovery requests must be specific. This avoids drawing an objection from opposing counsel where the . endobj /P 476 0 R /Pg 14 0 R /S /LBody 2 0 obj /Type /StructElem /Pg 15 0 R endobj /P 476 0 R /K [5] << endobj << 273 0 obj /P 10 0 R 57 0 obj << /Parent 6 0 R M i c r o s o f t W o r d 2 0 1 6; modified using iText 2.1.7 by 1T3XT /K [3] >> /K [1] /S /P >> endobj >> /P 472 0 R /S /P endobj << 154 0 obj /Parent 6 0 R /P 478 0 R /S /P /S /P /Pg 13 0 R /Type /StructElem /Pg 27 0 R /K [10] << 58 0 obj<> endobj >> 235 0 obj /Pg 18 0 R /S /P >> /K [3] H|= /P 10 0 R /Pg 31 0 R An interrogatory may ask for an opinion or contention that relates to fact or the application of law to fact, or that asks for information not within the personal knowledge of the party. Notably, the Fourth District held that, generally, photographs on a social networking site are not privileged, nor are they protected by any right of privacy, regardless of the privacy settings a user elects to establish on their account. endobj 258 0 obj /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem Interrogatories may contain specially defined terms, as long as these definitions are reasonable and not subject to misinterpretation. /S /P << /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R /Pg 32 0 R endobj /S /P 21 [220 0 R 221 0 R 222 0 R 223 0 R 294 0 R 295 0 R 296 0 R 297 0 R 298 0 R 299 0 R >> /S /P endobj endstream /Pg 26 0 R endobj /K [4] /S /LBody /Type /StructElem /K [20] << endobj /Contents [415 0 R 416 0 R 417 0 R] 0000007100 00000 n /S /P 259 0 obj endobj << /S /Footnote >> endobj Answers made by a party are not binding on a co-party. /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] >> 49 0 obj /Type /StructElem /S /P /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /P 10 0 R 320 0 R 225 0 R 226 0 R 227 0 R 228 0 R 229 0 R 230 0 R 231 0 R 232 0 R 233 0 R] 271 0 obj This article provides guidance on countering objections arising during discovery in Florida state actions. /P 10 0 R /P 472 0 R /Type /StructElem P. 1.280(b); Fla. R. Civ. /P 443 0 R 24, No. /K [16] /Resources 393 0 R /Pg 25 0 R /Pg 13 0 R %%EOF %%EOF /Type /StructElem /P 462 0 R >> <>/ExtGState<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/Annots[ 21 0 R] /MediaBox[ 0 0 612 792] /Contents 4 0 R/Group<>/Tabs/S/StructParents 0>> >> /P 10 0 R /Pg 34 0 R endobj /S /P >> << /K [454 0 R] 655 0 obj <> endobj 251 0 obj /P 477 0 R /S /P /Pg 15 0 R /Pg 13 0 R >> /Type /Group endobj /Type /StructElem /Tabs /S << /S /P /Size 113 /Prev 323787 /Type /StructElem /S /P One of the first cases defense attorneys should rely upon is the Fourth District Court of Appeals opinion in Nucci v. Target Corp., 162 So.3d 146 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015), in which the plaintiff slipped and fell in a Target store. /K [2] << endobj >> /Pg 29 0 R << /Contents [405 0 R 406 0 R 407 0 R] << % /K [4] << /Type /StructElem 0000177044 00000 n /Pg 29 0 R endobj /K [15] /Annots [] << >> /P 10 0 R endobj /S /Span >> endobj 15 0 obj /S /P /Pg 13 0 R /S /P /StructParents 0 /P 10 0 R /StructParents 5 >> endobj /P 10 0 R 159 0 obj /P 446 0 R /S /P /K [5] /S /P /K [4] /K [7] /Pg 16 0 R Generalized assertions of privilege will be rejected. /Dialogsheet /Part /Pg 19 0 R /S /P >> /Annots [] >> /K [23] /Type /StructElem 72 41 << /K [6] /P 10 0 R /Group 354 0 R << /Resources 368 0 R endobj /S /P /K [22] stream endobj All Rights Reserved. 0 /Group 419 0 R 3: Provide a summary of the expected testimony of each witness identified in response to Interrogatory No. %PDF-1.6 % P. 1.340 (a). /Annots [] endobj /P 10 0 R /Pg 18 0 R /S /P /Pg 14 0 R /Type /Page /Type /StructElem /Pg 24 0 R 0000003211 00000 n 0000004751 00000 n endobj /P 10 0 R /StructParents 7 120 0 obj /Pg 15 0 R /Type /StructElem endobj /K [9] /P 474 0 R /K [5] /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem 141 0 obj >> /K [5] /S /P /S /P Defense attorneys can expect objections to any social media-related discovery requests that exceed those contemplated by the Nucci court. 307 0 obj /Pg 33 0 R << Not surprisingly, many plaintiffs now object to any discovery requests seeking social media information on grounds including overbreadth, vagueness and violation of the right to privacy. P. 1.340(b). >> /Pg 13 0 R /S /L /Pg 20 0 R /Pg 22 0 R Arguments that a court should allow relevant and reasonably calculated photographs originating from a social media account, but not, say, text-based writings, are not only logically inconsistent with Nucci, but they are also internally inconsistent with Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(b)(1), which allows [d]iscovery regarding any matter, not privileged, that is relevant to the subject matter of the pending action, whether it relates to the claim or defense of the party seeking discovery or the claim or defense of any other party.. 305 0 obj /Type /Metadata /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem /Pg 13 0 R /Pg 26 0 R endobj /S /P /Pg 28 0 R endobj >> /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /P 10 0 R /Contents [355 0 R 356 0 R 357 0 R] /Pg 16 0 R /K [2] /Type /StructElem uuid:39348FAF-56C1-45B6-9267-1F93B3F12615uuid:39348FAF-56C1-45B6-9267-1F93B3F12615 endobj /S /P /S /P endobj /K [6] /Type /StructElem /Pg 14 0 R /K [456 0 R] endobj . 0000173781 00000 n P. 1.340(d). >> << << /Type /StructElem >> >> Fla. R. Civ. /Pg 29 0 R /S /P When photographs seemingly disappeared after the plaintiffs deposition, the defendant moved to compel inspection of the plaintiffs Facebook profile. /Type /StructElem >> /Pg 16 0 R /P 10 0 R /Pg 34 0 R CCP, which can be used in other jurisdictions as well. endobj 233 0 obj >> /P 10 0 R 127 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<7DD03834BE9A944CAF0E37776813323A><18B09DF8875632499EC042FF89B6BD03>]/Index[107 30]/Info 106 0 R/Length 97/Prev 120659/Root 108 0 R/Size 137/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream endobj /Workbook /Document /S /P /S /P /ID (Note 1) /K [3] >> /S /P /S /P endobj /Type /StructElem /S /P /P 10 0 R /S /P /Type /StructElem endobj /Pg 27 0 R P. 1.340 (a). endobj /K [36] /Type /StructElem /Pg 34 0 R Enter to open, tab to navigate, enter to select, Practical Law Standard Document w-032-8526, https://content.next.westlaw.com/practical-law/document/Ifc45d63a22db11ecbea4f0dc9fb69570/Interrogatories-FL?viewType=FullText&transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default). 180 0 obj /P 441 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] "bKXkIBC0R"/#HZP{!H1b78 >> >> endobj 153 0 obj 139 0 obj /S /P endobj << 0000177540 00000 n /S /P /StructParents 2 << /Pg 15 0 R 2000 Market Street, Suite 2300 264 0 R 265 0 R 266 0 R 267 0 R 268 0 R 269 0 R 38 0 R 39 0 R 40 0 R 41 0 R] /Pg 13 0 R 210 0 obj endobj endobj >> /K [15] 165 0 obj endobj /Pg 27 0 R % /Pg 19 0 R /S /P /Type /StructElem /Group 374 0 R << /Tabs /S << 34 0 obj /K [0] endobj 272 0 obj 0000052244 00000 n /Type /StructElem 284 0 R 285 0 R] endobj 151 0 obj 205 0 R 206 0 R 207 0 R 208 0 R 209 0 R 210 0 R 211 0 R 212 0 R 213 0 R 214 0 R .*fgg!hL_F"$TXdV2=<8\2h? /P 10 0 R '[GDR4x J1N5DWk)VKV `kby6 DTCD)KVDm2K"jQwEf^VUdhE#u,ZnJ'x7eX;([([res,VZ FE1-qlhJfAje << 0000000016 00000 n /Pg 13 0 R /K [8] endobj /K [17] The authorities cited in this At A Glance Guide are current as of the publication date. /Type /StructElem /S /P >> /S /P /P 10 0 R endobj 3 [54 0 R 55 0 R 56 0 R 57 0 R 58 0 R 59 0 R 60 0 R 61 0 R 62 0 R 63 0 R >> l@Ad ? /Type /Page << << /S /P /S /P >> /K [4] /Type /Page << << /Type /StructElem /Pg 34 0 R OBJECTIONS. /Pg 18 0 R /Type /StructElem 174 0 obj << >> << /Type /StructElem /K [13] A party must obtain permission of the court to send more than 10 additional interrogatories. /Pg 30 0 R /P 321 0 R /Pg 21 0 R /Tabs /S /P 471 0 R >> /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem /P 468 0 R endstream endobj 656 0 obj <>/Metadata 30 0 R/PageLayout/OneColumn/Pages 653 0 R/StructTreeRoot 174 0 R/Type/Catalog>> endobj 657 0 obj <>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI]>>/Rotate 0/StructParents 0/Type/Page>> endobj 658 0 obj <>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Subtype/Form/Type/XObject>>stream 93 0 obj << Crfp8#C,.fOb9 q"BNLHY ?\YnxNcz6xoE 0fyR"_HZL%E]BVfqa. /Pg 19 0 R 181 0 obj 171 0 obj >> /S /P 0000001255 00000 n /Annots [] /K [3] >> endobj >> endobj /Type /StructElem >> /Type /StructElem endobj /K 27 << /Type /Page /Type /StructElem /S /Span /S /LBody %%EOF << 254 0 obj This Note addresses the duty to search for responsive information, who must respond to interrogatories, the types of responses that the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure permit, and the service and filing requirements for interrogatories. << endobj 76 0 R 77 0 R 78 0 R 79 0 R 80 0 R 81 0 R 82 0 R 83 0 R 84 0 R 85 0 R >> /K [466 0 R] /P 10 0 R << >> /Pg 34 0 R /Pg 23 0 R >> /P 10 0 R /Group 414 0 R >> 13 [144 0 R 288 0 R 146 0 R 147 0 R 148 0 R 149 0 R 150 0 R 151 0 R 289 0 R 153 0 R] endobj /S /P 219 0 obj << 566 (C.D. /S /P 42 0 obj << 289 0 obj /S /P << /Info 13 0 R /Pg 23 0 R endobj FORM INTERROGATORY NO. /K [4] /K [2] >> /Count 22 /Pg 19 0 R /P 10 0 R /Pg 18 0 R 310 0 R 311 0 R 312 0 R 313 0 R 314 0 R 315 0 R 316 0 R 317 0 R 318 0 R 319 0 R 127 0 obj << >> /S /Footnote 193 0 obj /Resources 358 0 R 201 0 obj /Pg 27 0 R General or blanket objections should be used only when they apply to every interrogatory. /K [6] /K [5] 0000007591 00000 n /S /P /K [1] For more detailed information, please see the SmartRules Response to Interrogatory Guide for the court where your action is pending. endobj
Byron High School Yearbook,
Disney Baseball Tournaments 2022,
What To Say When You Meet A Celebrity,
Liverpool Taxi Street Knowledge Test,
Stockdale Funeral Home : Camden, Tn Obituaries,
Articles S